Promises, Paradoxes, and the Price of Care: The Impact of the Big Beautiful Bill on Healthcare
- Science Holic
- 4 hours ago
- 4 min read
Author: Christine Chen
Editors: Hwi-On Lee, Emily Yu
Artist: Emily Hu
On July 4, 2025, while fireworks went off across the skies of the nation, a far less celebratory moment unfolded throughout the halls of power. President Donald Trump signed the ”One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBB) into law, marking a pivotal moment in U.S. health policy. Passed narrowly through budget reconciliations, this legislation promises historic investment in rural healthcare while simultaneously enacting the largest cuts to federal health programs in decades. The result is a complexity of opportunity and challenge, innovation and austerity, with profound consequences for millions of Americans who depend on Medicaid, Medicare, and rural health services.
Central to the OBBB is the creation of the Rural Health Transformation Program (RHTP), a $50 billion federal fund distributed over 5 years, intended to improve the fragile infrastructure of healthcare in rural America. For communities that were left behind by economic shifts, this creation is a powerful beacon of hope. Yet, the very same legislation erases over $1 trillion from federal health programs, overwhelmingly targeting Medicaid, the nation’s largest and most vulnerable health insurance program. What results is millions of citizens getting caught in the turbulent crossfire.
The location of rural hospitals has been a quiet crisis for decades. Imagine the closest ER from you being over 10 miles away. Additionally, hospitals operate with smaller bed counts and patient volumes are far lower than in urban areas. The new RHTP program promises to help these hospitals survive and adapt. These funds, administered through states rather than given directly to the hospitals, are designed to promote long-term benefits. States are required to submit a detailed transformation plan to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), outlining their strategies, their partnerships, their adoption of new technology, and their recruitments. Yet the structure of the program leaves gaps. CMS Administrator Mahmet Oz wields broad discretion in approving these plans and allocating funds. There is little oversight or performance accountability checkers, meaning states can choose to prioritize health technology or chronic disease management in ways that cannot find its way to the doors of rural hospitals. Data from the University of North Carolina’s Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research revealed that 338 rural hospitals nationwide could be severely impacted, whether that means they are forced to close, convert to smaller facilities, or lose critical funding. This five year funding program stands at a stark contrast to the permanent Medicaid cuts and threatens to pull the rug out from beneath the very hospitals this law aims to save.
Medicaid covers nearly 90 million Americans including children, seniors, people with disabilities, and entire families living in poverty. It is the bedrock of healthcare access for millions. Under the new law, Medicaid faces historic reduction through multiple mechanisms resulting in increasingly frequent and rigorous eligibility verifications, restrictions on state funding tools, and the expiration of crucial subsidies for health coverage under the Affordable Care Act at the end of 2025. States, already reeling from budgetary pressures, must decide how to use their funds, balancing the demands of the RHTP against the permanent loss of Medicaid dollars.
Similarly, Medicare changes are also reshaping access for many seniors and disabled Americans. There are new eligibility restrictions on lawfully present immigrants, barring groups like refugees, asylum seekers, and more. Many of the individuals who use Medicare have contributed to the payroll tax base which funds the program itself, only to be excluded from its protection years later. The impact threatens to push some elderly immigrants into the shadow of medical debts. The bill itself freezes improvements to Medicare Savings Programs, which assist low-income beneficiaries with out-of-pocket costs, saving the government billions but risking greater financial hardship for seniors.
While it is impossible to predict the bill’s full impact in the upcoming years, the warnings are clear: without compassion and political courage, this landmark legislation may widen the chasm it claims to bridge. America’s healthcare isn’t just written into laws, it's written into the hearts of millions who rely on the government to serve as their lifelines. We can count the dollars saved by cutting Medicaid or we can count the miles to the nearest ER, but only one of those numbers will kill you if you get them wrong. While the Big Beautiful Bill promises freedom, there is no freedom in choosing the last unlocked hospital entrance.
Citations:
Doctrow, Jon. “This Little‑Noticed Update to Medicaid Rules Could Burden Seniors with
Thousands in Medical Debt.” MarketWatch, 2025,
Hawke, Lisa, and Sarah Starling Crossan. “One Big Beautiful Bill Act Includes $50 Billion
Rural Health Transformation Program.” Holland & Knight, July 2025,
“Impact of the ‘Big Bill’ on Medicare.” Center for Medicare Advocacy, 24 July 2025,
Johnson, Carole. “The ‘One Big Beautiful Bill,’ Now Law, Does Not Protect Rural
Hospitals.” Health Affairs Forefront, 23 July 2025,
“Medicaid and Medicare Turn 60 Years Old — and Face Historic Cuts Decades in the
Making.” The Guardian, 30 July 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-
“The Big Budget Bill Could Make Your ER a Mess.” TIME, 3 July 2025,
“The One Big Beautiful Bill Is a Historic Investment in Rural Healthcare.” The White House,
“What Health Care Provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act Mean for States.” National
Academy for State Health Policy, July 2025, https://nashp.org/what-health-care-
“What Is the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ and Its Impact?” League of Women Voters, July 2025,
“14 Washington Rural Hospitals Face Risk of Closure under Proposed Federal Cuts.” KIRO
7 News, 5 Aug. 2025, https://www.kiro7.com/news/local/14-washington-rural-hospitals-
Comments